<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/</link>
	<description>Spinning the Social Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 06:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elearning Strateji ve Teknolojilerine Yönelik 35 Önemli Makale &#171; Elearning Guru</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-6103</link>
		<dc:creator>Elearning Strateji ve Teknolojilerine Yönelik 35 Önemli Makale &#171; Elearning Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 06:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1886#comment-6103</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 Strategy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 Strategy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 35 Articles on eLearning Strategy : eLearning Technolog &#171; juandon. Innovación y conocimiento</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-6011</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 35 Articles on eLearning Strategy : eLearning Technolog &#171; juandon. Innovación y conocimiento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1886#comment-6011</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 Strategy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 Strategy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: top 35 Articles on eLearning Strategy development &#124; Paul&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-5997</link>
		<dc:creator>top 35 Articles on eLearning Strategy development &#124; Paul&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1886#comment-5997</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 Strategy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 Strategy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Strategy&#160;&#124;&#160;weiterbildungsblog</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Strategy&#160;&#124;&#160;weiterbildungsblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1886#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>[...] Da sich die wenigsten von uns den ASTD State of the Industry Report for 2009 leisten werden, verlinke ich hier auf die untenstehende Grafik. Ist sie realistisch? Oder zu &#8220;amerikanisch&#8221;, weil man dort immer ein paar Jahre voraus ist? Na ja, die Vorhersage ist sehr weich formuliert &#8230; Janet Clarey leitet aus den Zahlen noch einige strategische Überlegungen ab. Und verlinkt am Ende auf ein kurzes &#8220;Learning 2.0&#8243;-Paper, das jeden Leser in der Fußzeile warnt: &#8220;Do not reproduce&#8221;! Klar. Janet Clarey, A Brandon Hall Research blog, 9. Februar 2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Da sich die wenigsten von uns den ASTD State of the Industry Report for 2009 leisten werden, verlinke ich hier auf die untenstehende Grafik. Ist sie realistisch? Oder zu &#8220;amerikanisch&#8221;, weil man dort immer ein paar Jahre voraus ist? Na ja, die Vorhersage ist sehr weich formuliert &#8230; Janet Clarey leitet aus den Zahlen noch einige strategische Überlegungen ab. Und verlinkt am Ende auf ein kurzes &#8220;Learning 2.0&#8243;-Paper, das jeden Leser in der Fußzeile warnt: &#8220;Do not reproduce&#8221;! Klar. Janet Clarey, A Brandon Hall Research blog, 9. Februar 2010 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jclarey</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-4052</link>
		<dc:creator>jclarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1886#comment-4052</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s a curve anymore...kind of a wave ready to overtake you or for you to ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure it&#39;s a curve anymore&#8230;kind of a wave ready to overtake you or for you to ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnstearns</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2010/02/09/web-2-0-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-4049</link>
		<dc:creator>johnstearns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1886#comment-4049</guid>
		<description>Provocative as always Janet!   Given the range of definitions of &quot;Web 2.0&quot; really is (&quot;a transport mechanism, the ether through which interactivity happens,&quot; Darcy Dinucci, to &quot;a piece of jargon,&quot; Tim Berners-Lee), I&#039;m not sure whether it&#039;s productive to consider Web 2.0 as anything much beyond a suggestion to de-balkanize threads of learning in organizations.   In every case, each will be distinguishing (I hope) fad from useful function..   Of course, for those who bog down, whether from confusion or exhaustion, there&#039;s always &quot;Web 3.0&quot; if you really want to get in front of the curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Provocative as always Janet!   Given the range of definitions of &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; really is (&#8220;a transport mechanism, the ether through which interactivity happens,&#8221; Darcy Dinucci, to &#8220;a piece of jargon,&#8221; Tim Berners-Lee), I&#39;m not sure whether it&#39;s productive to consider Web 2.0 as anything much beyond a suggestion to de-balkanize threads of learning in organizations.   In every case, each will be distinguishing (I hope) fad from useful function..   Of course, for those who bog down, whether from confusion or exhaustion, there&#39;s always &#8220;Web 3.0&#8243; if you really want to get in front of the curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

