<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I declare social media sufficiently mainstream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/</link>
	<description>Spinning the Social Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Unrein</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-4041</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Unrein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-4041</guid>
		<description>Janet, what do you mean by &quot;taking a gardener approach to social networks at work&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet, what do you mean by &#8220;taking a gardener approach to social networks at work&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Jarche &#187; Friday&#8217;s Finds #14</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Jarche &#187; Friday&#8217;s Finds #14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;I declare social media sufficiently mainstream&#8221; says @jclarey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;I declare social media sufficiently mainstream&#8221; says @jclarey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-3807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-3807</guid>
		<description>To me, it makes sense to &lt;i&gt;recognize&lt;/i&gt; a difference between work and non-work; otherwise, you haven&#039;t got anything to balance.  How someone maintains that balance, obviously, is up to them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe it&#039;s a difference of degree, in that how you define &quot;difference&quot; isn&#039;t how I define it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Readers &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; filter, though I think it&#039;s evident that some readers don&#039;t, any more than some people separate driving a car from talking on the phone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think writers filter, almost by definition: you chose what to say and what not to, even if your choices end up implying unintended things to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it makes sense to <i>recognize</i> a difference between work and non-work; otherwise, you haven&#39;t got anything to balance.  How someone maintains that balance, obviously, is up to them.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#39;s a difference of degree, in that how you define &#8220;difference&#8221; isn&#39;t how I define it.  </p>
<p>Readers <i>can</i> filter, though I think it&#39;s evident that some readers don&#39;t, any more than some people separate driving a car from talking on the phone.</p>
<p>I do think writers filter, almost by definition: you chose what to say and what not to, even if your choices end up implying unintended things to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-5801</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-5801</guid>
		<description>To me, it makes sense to &lt;i&gt;recognize&lt;/i&gt; a difference between work and non-work; otherwise, you haven&#039;t got anything to balance.  How someone maintains that balance, obviously, is up to them.Maybe it&#039;s a difference of degree, in that how you define &quot;difference&quot; isn&#039;t how I define it.  Readers &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; filter, though I think it&#039;s evident that some readers don&#039;t, any more than some people separate driving a car from talking on the phone.I do think writers filter, almost by definition: you chose what to say and what not to, even if your choices end up implying unintended things to others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it makes sense to <i>recognize</i> a difference between work and non-work; otherwise, you haven&#39;t got anything to balance.  How someone maintains that balance, obviously, is up to them.Maybe it&#39;s a difference of degree, in that how you define &#8220;difference&#8221; isn&#39;t how I define it.  Readers <i>can</i> filter, though I think it&#39;s evident that some readers don&#39;t, any more than some people separate driving a car from talking on the phone.I do think writers filter, almost by definition: you chose what to say and what not to, even if your choices end up implying unintended things to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WritersCoach21</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>WritersCoach21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>As a writing group leader, I am very interested in keeping my members up-to-date about the latest technology that could be useful in promoting their work.  At this point, I&#039;ve found Twitter seems to be the best vehicle, especially for those in the early stages of social networking.  140 character tweets encourage writers to be specific and to the point.  In addition, they can quickly find people of like interest, establish a following, and develop contacts for future projects or announcements of the latest . Feel free to &quot;Tweet me&quot; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a writing group leader, I am very interested in keeping my members up-to-date about the latest technology that could be useful in promoting their work.  At this point, I&#39;ve found Twitter seems to be the best vehicle, especially for those in the early stages of social networking.  140 character tweets encourage writers to be specific and to the point.  In addition, they can quickly find people of like interest, establish a following, and develop contacts for future projects or announcements of the latest . Feel free to &#8220;Tweet me&#8221; at <a href="http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21" rel="nofollow">http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WritersCoach21</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-5800</link>
		<dc:creator>WritersCoach21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-5800</guid>
		<description>As a writing group leader, I am very interested in keeping my members up-to-date about the latest technology that could be useful in promoting their work.  At this point, I&#039;ve found Twitter seems to be the best vehicle, especially for those in the early stages of social networking.  140 character tweets encourage writers to be specific and to the point.  In addition, they can quickly find people of like interest, establish a following, and develop contacts for future projects or announcements of the latest . Feel free to &quot;Tweet me&quot; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a writing group leader, I am very interested in keeping my members up-to-date about the latest technology that could be useful in promoting their work.  At this point, I&#39;ve found Twitter seems to be the best vehicle, especially for those in the early stages of social networking.  140 character tweets encourage writers to be specific and to the point.  In addition, they can quickly find people of like interest, establish a following, and develop contacts for future projects or announcements of the latest . Feel free to &#8220;Tweet me&#8221; at <a href="http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21" rel="nofollow">http://Twitter.com/WritersCoach21</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Unrein</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Unrein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>A very apt metaphor! (although I apparently don&#039;t garden enough for it to be immediately obvious... or maybe I should go back on the caffeine...) I&#039;ve seen quite a few social networks wither on the vine for lack of this kind of cultivation (tell me how I&#039;m doing with this). We tend to have an &quot;if you build it, they will come&quot; sort of mentality when the truth is that building a social network is somewhere between publishing a newspaper and opening a new bar... hardly lazy endeavors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think you&#039;re right; everyone has been struggling with this online persona thing in the past few years. I tend to filter by location; I use LinkedIn and Twitter for professional networking -- well, really more *conversations* than networking, but you could see it either way -- and Facebook for personal connections. Except now everyone is on Facebook, which means I have to use very real filters so that people I barely know (and may one day be employers or clients) don&#039;t see which Twin Peaks character I&#039;m most like!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very apt metaphor! (although I apparently don&#39;t garden enough for it to be immediately obvious&#8230; or maybe I should go back on the caffeine&#8230;) I&#39;ve seen quite a few social networks wither on the vine for lack of this kind of cultivation (tell me how I&#39;m doing with this). We tend to have an &#8220;if you build it, they will come&#8221; sort of mentality when the truth is that building a social network is somewhere between publishing a newspaper and opening a new bar&#8230; hardly lazy endeavors.</p>
<p>I think you&#39;re right; everyone has been struggling with this online persona thing in the past few years. I tend to filter by location; I use LinkedIn and Twitter for professional networking &#8212; well, really more *conversations* than networking, but you could see it either way &#8212; and Facebook for personal connections. Except now everyone is on Facebook, which means I have to use very real filters so that people I barely know (and may one day be employers or clients) don&#39;t see which Twin Peaks character I&#39;m most like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Unrein</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-5799</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Unrein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-5799</guid>
		<description>A very apt metaphor! (although I apparently don&#039;t garden enough for it to be immediately obvious... or maybe I should go back on the caffeine...) I&#039;ve seen quite a few social networks wither on the vine for lack of this kind of cultivation (tell me how I&#039;m doing with this). We tend to have an &quot;if you build it, they will come&quot; sort of mentality when the truth is that building a social network is somewhere between publishing a newspaper and opening a new bar... hardly lazy endeavors.I think you&#039;re right; everyone has been struggling with this online persona thing in the past few years. I tend to filter by location; I use LinkedIn and Twitter for professional networking -- well, really more *conversations* than networking, but you could see it either way -- and Facebook for personal connections. Except now everyone is on Facebook, which means I have to use very real filters so that people I barely know (and may one day be employers or clients) don&#039;t see which Twin Peaks character I&#039;m most like!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very apt metaphor! (although I apparently don&#39;t garden enough for it to be immediately obvious&#8230; or maybe I should go back on the caffeine&#8230;) I&#39;ve seen quite a few social networks wither on the vine for lack of this kind of cultivation (tell me how I&#39;m doing with this). We tend to have an &#8220;if you build it, they will come&#8221; sort of mentality when the truth is that building a social network is somewhere between publishing a newspaper and opening a new bar&#8230; hardly lazy endeavors.I think you&#39;re right; everyone has been struggling with this online persona thing in the past few years. I tend to filter by location; I use LinkedIn and Twitter for professional networking &#8212; well, really more *conversations* than networking, but you could see it either way &#8212; and Facebook for personal connections. Except now everyone is on Facebook, which means I have to use very real filters so that people I barely know (and may one day be employers or clients) don&#39;t see which Twin Peaks character I&#39;m most like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jclarey</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-3804</link>
		<dc:creator>jclarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-3804</guid>
		<description>A gardener plants, weeds, waters, fertilizes, harvests, protects from pests, etc. So when I say &#039;&#039;take a gardening approach to social networks at work&quot; I mean doing those same types of tasks. Often times I think we create a spot for the garden (create a social network) and then fail to do much with it. Taking that a step further, you can think of community gardening and what it takes to make those successful - access, materials, people, connections...&lt;br&gt;An apt metaphor I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gardener plants, weeds, waters, fertilizes, harvests, protects from pests, etc. So when I say &#39;&#39;take a gardening approach to social networks at work&#8221; I mean doing those same types of tasks. Often times I think we create a spot for the garden (create a social network) and then fail to do much with it. Taking that a step further, you can think of community gardening and what it takes to make those successful &#8211; access, materials, people, connections&#8230;<br />An apt metaphor I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jclarey</title>
		<link>http://janetclarey.com/2009/08/11/i-declare-social-media-sufficiently-mainstream/comment-page-1/#comment-5798</link>
		<dc:creator>jclarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetclarey.com/?p=1317#comment-5798</guid>
		<description>A gardener plants, weeds, waters, fertilizes, harvests, protects from pests, etc. So when I say &#039;&#039;take a gardening approach to social networks at work&quot; I mean doing those same types of tasks. Often times I think we create a spot for the garden (create a social network) and then fail to do much with it. Taking that a step further, you can think of community gardening and what it takes to make those successful - access, materials, people, connections...An apt metaphor I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gardener plants, weeds, waters, fertilizes, harvests, protects from pests, etc. So when I say &#39;&#39;take a gardening approach to social networks at work&#8221; I mean doing those same types of tasks. Often times I think we create a spot for the garden (create a social network) and then fail to do much with it. Taking that a step further, you can think of community gardening and what it takes to make those successful &#8211; access, materials, people, connections&#8230;An apt metaphor I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

